IIPM Admission 2010

Monday, September 22, 2008

Debunking the Regan myth to curry favour with conservatives


IIPM : EXECUTIVE EDUCATION

Reagan might have got it all wrong. But is there any point for US presidential candidates to time and again re-hash the same old story?


Historical narratives matter. That’s why conservatives are still writing books denouncing FDR and the New Deal; they understand that the way Americans perceive bygone eras, even eras from the seemingly distant past, affects politics today. And it’s also why the furor over Barack Obama’s praise for Ronald Reagan is not, as some think, overblown. Fact is that how we talk about the Reagan era still matters immensely for American politics.

Bill Clinton knew that in 1991, when he began his presidential campaign. “The Reagan-Bush years,” he declared, “have exalted private gain over public obligation, special interests over the common good, wealth and fame over work and family. 80s ushered in a Gilded Age of greed & selfishness, of irresponsibility & excess, and of neglect.” Contrast that with Obama’s recent statement, that Reagan offered a “sense of dynamism and entrepreneurship that had been missing.” Maybe Obama was, as his supporters insist, simply praising Reagan’s political skills. But where in his remarks was the clear declaration that Reaganomics failed? For it did fail. The Reagan economy was a one-hit wonder. Yes, there was a boom in the mid-1980s, as the economy recovered from a severe recession. But while the rich got much richer, there was little sustained economic improvement for most Americans. By the late 1980s, middle-class incomes were barely higher than they had been a decade before – and the poverty rate had actually risen. When the inevitable recession arrived, people felt betrayed – a sense of betrayal that Clinton was able to ride into the White House.

Given that reality, what was Obama talking about? Some good things did eventually happen to the US economy – but not on Reagan’s watch. I understand why conservatives want to rewrite history & pretend that good things happened while a Republican was in office. But why would a self-proclaimed progressive say anything that lends credibility to this rewriting of history – particularly right now, when Reaganomics has just failed all over again?

Like Ronald Reagan, President Bush began his term in office with big tax cuts for the rich and promises that the benefits would trickle down to the middle class. Like Reagan, he also began his term with an economic slump, then claimed that the recovery from that slump proved the success of his policies. And like Reaganomics, Bushonomics has ended in grief. Public mood today is as grim as it was in 1992. Wages are lagging behind inflation. Employment growth in the Bush years has been pathetic compared with job creation in the Clinton era. Even if we don’t have a formal recession, the optimism of 90s has evaporated. This is a time when Progressives ought to drive home the idea that right’s ideas don’t work and never have.

It’s not just a matter of what happens in the next election. Clinton won his elections, but – as Obama correctly pointed out – he didn’t change America’s trajectory the way Reagan did. Why?

The great failure of Clinton administration was the fact that it didn’t change the narrative, a fact demonstrated by the way Republicans are still claiming to be the next Ronald Reagan. Now Progressives have been granted a second chance to argue that Reaganism is fundamentally wrong: Once again, vast majority of Americans think that the country is on the wrong track. But they won’t be able to make that argument if their political leaders, whatever they meant to convey, seem to be saying that Reagan had it right.

Paul Krugman

For more articles, Click on IIPM Article.

Source : IIPM Editorial, 2008

An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri and Arindam chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist).

Read these article :-
‘This is one of Big B’s best performances’
IIPM to come up at Rajarhat
IIPM awards four Bengali novelists
ZEE BUSINESS BEST B SCHOOL SURVEY
B-schooled in India, Placed Abroad (Print Version)
IIPM in Financial times (Print Version)
IIPM makes business education truly global (Print Version)
The Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM)
IIPM Campus
The Hindu : Education Plus : Honour for IIPM
IIPM ranked No.1 B-School in India, Management News - By ...
IIPM Ranked No1 B-School in India
Moneycontrol >> News >> Press- News >> IIPM ranked No1 B-School in ...
IIPM ranked No. 1 B-school in India- Zee Business Survey ...
IIPM ranked No1 B-School in India :: Education, Careers ...
The Hindu Business Line : IIPM placements hit a high of over 2000 jobs
Deccan Herald - IIPM ranked as top B-School in India
India eNews - IIPM Ranked No1 B-School in India
IIPM Delhi - Indian Institute of Planning and Management New Delhi ...
domain-b.com : IIPM ranked ahead of IIMs


No comments: